My action research project assigned by my mentor, Mr. Hill, this week will be addressing how to improve scores on the World Geography Unit Tests in preparation for the End of Course Exams and the uncoming STAAR test in the Spring. This action research will encompass the entire World Geography faculty and World Geography students. This type of collaborative action research project is essential in moving us forward to an academically advanced school.
I believe, as Mr. Hill does, that this type of in-depth action research is highly significant and important to raising student's scores, the school's AYP as well presenting an open forum for collaborative learning and teaching by all stakeholders.
We will be doing an in-depth analysis of student's scores, past and present in our World Geography Professional Learning Community weekly meeting. We will identify the questions/concepts not being mastered and readjust our teaching methodologies to ensure mastery. This type of action research and analysis presents a win-win situation for students, faculty and administrators and encourages all to be life- long learners. We actually finished our first Unit I test analysis 9-5-12 and readjusted the test to reach the 70% mark for higher order thinking skills level testing. I believe if we put the challenge out there for the students, give them the tools to be successful they will arise to the challenge and succeed at levels higher than they ever imagined. Win-win!
The second action research topic that was discussed with Mr. Hill this past week concerned the Dress Code Violations at school. The administration had an assembly the first day of school to address the Dress Code for the district and there was some booing. There is the real issue, disrespect for rules and authority and that is a an issue of culture for the school, not school culture. The teachers are now called into the office if a student gets by from class to class with a Dress Code Violation without being sent to the office. He, like I agree, the teachers are an administrative arm and they need to enforce the rules as well. He and I will see if teacher reprimands increase in the next few weeks or if students begin to abide by the Dress Code more readily. When instruction time is cut for the students because they are sitting in the office, then learning does not take place. It is a disruption for all concerned.
The third area we discussed was improving communications between the Special Ed Department and the teachers who have students with disabilities, whether they are mental, physical or emotional, in our classes. Case in point, Thursday night at Open House a parent walked up to me and blurted out, “why aren’t you abiding by my son’s IEP? There were seven other parents there as well. It is the end of the second week of school and I did not have an IEP on her son. She proceeds to pull out a note written by him with nine IEP requirements that I was not fulfilling. I simply stated that I did not have any paperwork on her son and apologized for it not being in my files. She proceeded to take up 5 minutes with her son’s complaints. After she calmed down I told her she could be rest assured that I would have his paperwork by 8 AM the next day. It took me almost 1.5 hours to track it down and even the principal assigned to the student had no paperwork. This has been an on-going issue at our school. No communication between the Special Ed Department and the teachers. So, we are working together, even though it is not my Action Research Project we agreed upon, to see why this is happening and to design a way communication can take place effectively and in a timely manner. My concern as a teacher is that I have spent two weeks not providing what this student needed to be successful. As a future administrator, this is unacceptable. Communication and collaboration are two keys to the success of a school and sets the culture and a climate for learning.